prefix: doi.org/10.52283/1.ajbmr |
News UpdatesCurrent Issue: Vol.11 No.01 2026 Ajbmr indexed in Australian Business Dean Council (ABDC) | Find us on: Academic Journals Database, World Cat , ISI
Volume[10], Issue[01], 2025
-
The Influence of Partner Engagement on the Use of Monitoring and Evaluation Findings: The case of Non-Governmental Organizations in Nairobi, Kenya
► Ombisa Robert (Corresponding Author)
rombisa@strathmore.edu
https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8838-619X
► Omondi Bowa
►Anne Aseey
Received: 14 January, 2025
Final Revision: 20 June, 2025
Accepted: 22 June, 2025
Published: 2 August,2025
10.52283/NSWRCA.AJBMR.20251001A01
AbstractDevelopment programs have undergone a paradigm shift, transitioning from a focus on processes to an emphasis on results. The heightened demand for accountability regarding resource utilization and demonstrable success within the development sector, particularly among NGOs, has markedly intensified the necessity for Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E). Many studies have indicated that the utilization of M&E findings is lacking in the context of enhancing NGO performance. A theoretical perspective highlights that utilization-focused evaluation (UFE) is predicated on the notion that evaluations should be assessed based on their application and practical use. Furthermore, utilization is the primary criterion for expert evaluation requirements agreed upon globally. The dependent variable is the utilization of monitoring and evaluation findings, while partner engagement serves as the independent variable. The study aimed to evaluate the impact of partner engagement on the utilization of M&E findings. The research employed mixed-methods design. Multi-stage sampling was utilized, employing stratified random sampling to acquire a sample of 283 NGOs from a target population of 979. Structured questionnaires were employed to gather data, while interview guides were utilized to obtain Key Informant information for the purpose of result triangulation. Quantitative data were analyzed using bivariate regression, and qualitative data were examined through content analysis. The research indicated that partner engagement (r= 0.38; R²= 0.14; F= p<0.05) significantly affected the utilization of M&E findings. The research limitations included the NGOs' constrained timetables and their extensive distribution around Nairobi City. Moreover, respondents exhibited varying interpretations of the application of M&E results. The study advocates for sensitization workshops to empower partners with pertinent knowledge and skills, enabling them to be effective participants in processes. Boards of NGO management should mandate partner participation and urge leaders to promote such involvement to improve the utilization of monitoring and evaluation outcomes. The findings will be beneficial to funders, NGOs, M&E personnel, implementers, and researchers for policy development, citation, and financial guidance.Keywords: Partner Engagement; M&E Findings; Use of M&E Findings; NGOs, Nairobi City County.-
Joint Effect of Monitoring and Evaluation Tools, Capacity Building, Stakeholder Participation on Performance of Agricultural Programs in Kenya
►Peter Kamau Nduati (Corresponding Author)
► Stephen Wanyonyi Luketero
►Johnbosco Mutuku Kisimbii
►Mary Nyawira Mwenda
Received: 14 Feburary ,2025
Final Revision:10 April, 2025
Accepted: 12 May, 2025
Published: 5 August,2025AbstractThe main objective of the study was to assess the joint effect of monitoring and evaluation tools, capacity building, and stakeholder participation on the performance of the Climate-Smart Agricultural Productivity Program in Kitui County, Kenya. Descriptive survey, cross-sectional, and correlational research designs were adopted for the study. The unit of analysis was five projects under the Climate-Smart Agricultural Productivity Program in Kitui County. The sample size was 260 respondents. Data were collected and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The results revealed that the overall regression model of the joint influence of monitoring and evaluation tools, capacity building, and stakeholder participation had high explanatory power. The coefficient of determination was R = 0.841, R² = 0.707, and adjusted R² = 0.704. That is, the joint effect of the study variables explained 70.4 percent of the changes in the performance of the Climate-Smart Agricultural Productivity Program in Kitui County; therefore, 29.6 percent of the changes in performance were explained by other variables not considered in this study.An ANOVA test was conducted, and the results indicated that the overall model was significant, since F = 195.076, p = 0.000 < 0.05. Therefore, the null hypothesis was rejected, meaning that there was a significant joint effect of M&E tools, capacity building, and stakeholder participation on the performance of the Climate-Smart Agricultural Productivity Program in Kitui County, Kenya.Regarding individual significance, the constant (p = 0.811) and stakeholder participation (p = 0.603) were not significant, since their p-values were greater than the 0.05 significance level. In contrast, monitoring and evaluation tools and capacity building were significant, because their p-values (0.000) were less than the 0.05 level of significance. In conclusion, and using the standardized coefficients, it is more prudent to enhance capacity building, as a one-unit change in it has, on average, more impact on the performance of the Climate-Smart Agricultural Productivity Program in Kitui County.Keywords:Monitoring And Evaluation Tools, Capacity Building, Stakeholder Participation, Performance-
The Relationship Between Policy Implementation and Environmental Sustainability in The Oil and Gas Industry
►Richard Kipchirchir Too Chepkwony (Corresponding Author)
► Harriet Kidombo
►Christopher Gakuu
Received: 1 May, 2025
Final Revision: 19 June, 2025
Accepted: 25 June, 2025
Published: 22 August,2025AbstractDespite extensive global efforts to promote sustainable development, the oil and gas industry continues to face significant environmental challenges. Numerous strategies and regulatory frameworks have been introduced over the years, yet their effectiveness in curbing environmental degradation remains limited, particularly in resource-rich but ecologically fragile regions. This study investigates the relationship between policy implementation and environmental sustainability within the upstream oil and gas sector in Turkana County, Kenya. Using a mixed-methods approach and empirical data analysis, the study reveals a statistically significant but modest positive correlation (r = 0.292**) between policy implementation and environmental sustainability. Regression analysis further indicates that a unit increase in policy implementation leads to a 0.228-unit increase in environmental sustainability (p < 0.001). The findings highlight the importance of translating sound policy into actionable implementation, especially in sectors with high environmental stakes. While many governments have demonstrated the capacity to formulate sound policies, the persistent gap lies in the translation of these policies into tangible environmental outcomes. The findings from Turkana County, Kenya, reveal a statistically significant relationship between policy implementation and environmental sustainability, affirming that successful implementation directly contributes to improved ecological outcomes. Conversely, the modest strength of the correlation suggests that policy implementation alone is not sufficient and must be reinforced by complementary institutional and operational mechanisms.
Keywords:Policy Implementation, Environmental Sustainability, Oil and Gas Sector, Upstream Projects, Regulatory Frameworks, Turkana County Kenya.-
Moderating Effect of External Environment on the Relationship Between Risk Management and Project Performance of County-Funded Construction Projects
►Julius Mathenge Kabue(Corresponding Author)
► Christoper Gakuu
►Harriet Kidombo
►Augustine Mwangi
Received: 13 January, 2025
Final Revision: 22 June, 2025
Accepted: 25 June, 2025
Published:23 August,2025AbstractThis study investigates the moderating effect of the external environment on the relationship between risk management and project performance in county-funded construction projects in Nakuru County, Kenya. The research problem encompasses an overview of external environmental factors, including technological advancements, political conditions, social dynamics, and physical surroundings. The literature review further emphasizes the complex interplay between project performance and risk management in the construction sector, highlighting the significant influence of the external environment. The study is grounded in systems theory and contingency theory, which provide the theoretical framework for contextual analysis.
A predictive research design was employed to enable a systematic examination of the causal relationship between project risk management strategies and construction project performance. Both quantitative and qualitative analysis techniques were utilized for descriptive evaluation of project outcomes. Data were collected from 314 respondents, including contractors, subcontractors, project engineers, finance managers, and county project managers, using structured questionnaires and semi-structured interviews.
The findings indicate that risk management variables account for 58.9% of the variance in project performance. The inclusion of external environmental factors significantly increased the explained variance (ΔR² = .021, p < .001). Hierarchical multiple regression analysis further revealed that the external environment significantly moderates the relationship between risk management and project performance, explaining an additional 3.3% of the variance (ΔR² = .033, p < .001). The strong influence of the external environment, particularly the moderate to high impact of technological, regulatory, political, and financial factors, underscores the necessity for adaptive risk management strategies.
The study concludes that effective risk management strategies must be tailored to specific external contexts, especially in more challenging environments. This research contributes to both theory and practice by underscoring the importance of integrating environmental considerations into project risk management and by offering recommendations to enhance the performance of county-funded construction projects.
Keywords:Risk management, project performance, external environment, construction projects, county government, moderating effect.-
Evaluation Results Dissemination Strategy and Performance of Highway Construction Projects in Kenya
►Leonard Mue Musyoka(Corresponding Author)
► Reuben Wambua Kikwatha
►Johnbosco Mutuku Kisimbi
►Anthony Wainaina Ndungu
Received: 2 May, 2025
Final Revision: 29 June, 2025
Accepted: 30 August, 2025
Published: 2 Nov, 2025AbstractHighway construction projects in Kenya consistently encounter challenges such as delays, cost overruns, and suboptimal quality (Muchiri & Mose, 2022; Mugweru & Muchelule, 2022). These recurring issues underscore the critical need for enhanced decision-making and more effective stakeholder engagement (Ndurya and Bii, 2019). A crucial yet underexplored factor contributing to these challenges is the efficacy of evaluation results dissemination (Mutekhele et al., 2018). While evaluations are designed to foster improved project outcomes, prior research presents varied findings regarding the actual impact of dissemination strategies on project performance (Mutekhele et al., 2018). This study's objective was to investigate the influence of evaluation results dissemination strategy on the performance of highway construction projects in Kenya.
This research was grounded in the Utilization-Focused Evaluation (UFE) theory (Patton, 1978). Adopting a pragmatist research philosophy, the study employed a correlational design. The target population comprised 69 Category A road construction projects completed by the Kenya National Highways Authority (KeNHA) between 2018 and 2022. The respondents for these projects were the project managers across all 69 highway construction projects in Kenya. A census approach was utilized, ensuring the inclusion of all projects in the study.
The research incorporated both secondary and primary data. A data collection checklist was employed for gathering secondary data from KeNHA reports. Primary data were collected through semi-structured questionnaires. Qualitative data underwent thematic analysis, while quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics.
The study concluded that evaluation results dissemination strategy exerts a positive and significant impact on the performance of highway construction projects in Kenya. Consequently, the study recommends that project managers implement effective dissemination strategies for evaluation findings to facilitate timely and accessible communication with all stakeholders.
Keywords:Evaluation Results Dissemination, Performance, Construction Projects.-
Influence Of Market Innovation on The Association Between Fairtrade Practices and Performance of Certified Small Tea Producer Organizations in Kenya
►Fredrick Mutea (Corresponding Author)
► Francis Ndungu Kibera
►Mary Wanjiku Kinoti
►Winnie Gacugu Njeru
Received: 28 June, 2025
Final Revision: 15 September, 2025
Accepted: 29 October, 2025
Published: 8 December,2025AbstractTea is one of Kenya’s most important cash crops, supporting the livelihoods of approximately 560,000 smallholder farmers who contribute significantly to the country’s agricultural economy. The Fairtrade certification system has emerged as a key mechanism to promote ethical production, ensure equitable compensation, and support sustainable development among these farmers by fostering fairness, social justice, and respect for human rights throughout global supply chains. Despite the documented benefits of Fairtrade practices in improving market access and income stability for smallholder tea producer organizations, recent research (2025) highlights persistent challenges, particularly regarding the limited adoption of market innovation. This limitation constrains producers’ ability to respond effectively to shifting consumer preferences, technological advances, and competitive pressures, thereby restricting organizational performance and long-term sustainability.
This study addresses this critical gap by examining the moderating role of market innovation in the relationship between Fairtrade practices and the performance of certified small tea producer organizations in Kenya. The research is theoretically grounded in integrative social contract theory, which emphasizes ethical obligations within economic exchanges and the importance of mutually beneficial practices for sustainable development. Employing a descriptive cross-sectional design, the study collected data from 67 small tea producer organizations affiliated with the Kenya Tea Development Agency (KTDA) across 17 tea-growing counties, representing a broad cross-section of the sector.
Using semi-structured questionnaires and analyzing data through SPSS with descriptive and inferential statistics, including ANOVA, the findings demonstrate that Fairtrade practices have a significant positive effect on organizational performance. Importantly, this positive relationship is substantially strengthened when market innovation such as product diversification, adoption of new marketing strategies, and technological improvements is effectively integrated into organizational operations. The statistically significant moderating effect of market innovation (p < 0.05) underscores its crucial role in enabling smallholder organizations to adapt to dynamic market conditions, enhance competitiveness, and achieve sustainable growth.
By integrating ethical trade frameworks with innovative market approaches, this study contributes to existing knowledge by providing empirical evidence of how Fairtrade’s social objectives can be reinforced through innovation-driven strategies. The findings have practical implications for policymakers, development agencies, and tea producer organizations seeking to design interventions that balance social equity with market responsiveness. Ultimately, this research advances the discourse on sustainable agricultural development in Kenya and similar contexts by highlighting the necessity of combining social justice initiatives with market-oriented innovations to secure the future of smallholder tea farmers.Keywords:Market Innovation, Fairtrade Practices, Organisation Performance, Kenya.-
Participatory Action Research on Performance of HIV/AIDS Community Health Projects
►Ojall Grace Odawa (Corresponding Author)
►Charles Mallans Rambo
►Lillian Otieno Omutoko
►Salome Wambui Richu
Received: 27 May,2025
Final Revision:01 July,2025
Accepted: 6 Nov,2025
Published: 13 Dec, 2025AbstractDespite significant investments in HIV/AIDS community health interventions across sub-Saharan Africa, many projects continue to struggle with sustainability, effectiveness, and community ownership. In Kenya’s Kisumu County where HIV prevalence remains well above the national average the performance of such projects demands urgent attention. This study examined the influence of Participatory Action Research (PAR) on the performance of HIV/AIDS community health projects in Kisumu County, Kenya. Focusing on projects implemented by non-governmental organizations (NGOs), it investigated how PAR, along with participatory decision-making and participatory negotiations, impacted project outcomes. The research utilized a pragmatic paradigm, integrating both qualitative and quantitative methodologies, with descriptive survey and correlational designs. The study targeted 30,118 individuals, including project managers, monitoring and evaluation officers, and beneficiaries, with a final sample size of 379. Data analysis involved thematic exploration of interviews and documents, combined with statistical models such as linear regression and Pearson’s correlation. The results indicated a significant relationship between PAR and project performance, with a p-value of < .001, leading to the rejection of the null hypothesis. The findings suggested that PAR played a critical role in enhancing the effectiveness of HIV/AIDS community health projects, providing actionable insights for project managers and stakeholders. The study also recommended further research in different counties to explore additional factors influencing project performance through participatory approaches.Keywords:Community Health Projects, Participatory Action Research, Performance
-
-
-
-
-
-
